‹header›
‹date/time›
Click to edit Master text styles
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
‹footer›
‹#›
Total of 14 questions, respondents asked
to indicate how strongly they agree or disagree with the statements. Two questions concerning special waste management
are not included because of poor phrasing and unclear results.
General agreement that NV landfills are
safe.
General agreement that transfer stations
and public waste bins are safe.
Recognition that markets are needed to
stimulate recycling. Hard mandates are
out of favor, eg. bottle bill, landfill bans, enforceable recycling mandates, volume
based pricing.
Strong agreement that out-of-state waste
should pay for itself.
Strong agreement that state and local
government should buy recycled.
General agreement in favor of landfill
certification program. Disagreement among
rural respondents may reflect concern about resources to meet certification
requirements.
General agreement that we have affordable
access to landfills, though some disagreement among rural respondents.
General agreement that we have affordable
access to waste transfer facilities.
General agreement that we have affordable
solid waste collection services.
Strong perception of illegal dumping
problems in both urban and rural areas.
Urban respondents over whether recycling
services are adequate. Rural respondents
find it lacking.
Rural respondents see funding problem for
solid waste planning and implementation.