WWW   NDEP



Updated September 2009 — Lake Tahoe is world renowned for its striking blue color and amazing clarity. As such, the State of Nevada has designated Lake Tahoe as a Water of Extraordinary Aesthetic or Ecologic Value. However, NDEP was forced to list the waterbody on its 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies due to exceedances in the clarity standard. In addition,
Emerald Bay Sand Harber
monitoring conducted over the last 40 years has indicated a steady trend of loss in the Lake's transparency. To address this problem, NDEP is collaborating with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region (Lahontan Water Board) to develop the Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL).

The Lake Tahoe TMDL is a scientific effort at the forefront of the campaign to return Lake Tahoe water clarity to historic levels. The scale of the TMDL effort signifies the importance of this national treasure; to date the TMDL Program has involved research by nearly 200 scientists and engineers and more than a $10 million investment by the federal government and the states of Nevada and California as well as eight years of cooperation and participation by Tahoe resource management agencies, local governments and the public. In order to better manage the enormous undertaking of the Lake Tahoe TMDL, it was necessary to break the effort into three distinct phases, for which key questions were posed

Phase 1 involved the establishment of a comprehensive research program to answer the following questions:

  • What pollutants are causing Lake Tahoe's clarity loss?
  • What are the sources and quantities of each of these pollutants?
  • How much of each pollutant can Lake Tahoe accept and still reach the clarity goal?

The analysis indicates that the primary pollutants controlling clarity are fine sediment particles and the nutrients phosphorous and nitrogen. Fine sediment particles (FSP) cloud the water while nutrients fuel algal growth. Although each affects the distance that light is able to penetrate into the water column, the analysis indicates FSP, particularly those less than 16 micrometers, appear to be more important than nutrients due to their light scattering effect. The vast majority of FSP entering the Lake are derived from the urban area. Modeling results suggest that a 65% reduction in FSP, accompanied by reductions in nitrogen and phosphorous, are necessary to restore historic clarity within Lake Tahoe.

Detailed information can be found in the Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load Technical (Tech) Report [341 Pages - 5.8MB] or, view this slide presentation [29 Pages - 1.4MB] for an overview of the key results of the science, research and monitoring that was conducted for Phase 1.

Phase 2 of the TMDL attempts to answer these questions:

  • What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe?
  • What strategy should be implemented to achieve the clarity goal?

The Pollutant Reduction Opportunity (PRO) Report [March 2008: 451 Pages - 11 MB ] was a basin-wide analysis which quantified load reductions achievable from implementing various levels of pollutant control efforts. Together the Tech and PRO Reports provide the scientific and technical basis for the development of a recommended implementation strategy capable of achieving the Clarity Challenge. This interim target of 80 feet annual average Secchi disk depth to be achieved within 20 years, is important because scientists may then state with confidence that we have actually reversed the trend in clarity loss and are now moving in the path of restoring Lake Tahoe to its historic clarity. Approximately a 32% load reduction in FSP with accompanying reductions in nitrogen and phosphorous are needed to achieve the Clarity Challenge.

The recommended strategy to achieve the Clarity Challenge was born from a public/ stakeholder input process carried out between the fall of 2007 through the spring of 2008. The process was designed to evaluate the political and social acceptability of the strategy alternatives, with the goal of crafting a preferred strategy that received broad stakeholder support. While the recommended strategy calls for load reductions from the atmosphere, stream channels and the forested areas, it emphasizes FSP reductions through the control, treatment and prevention of urban stormwater. This stems from the conclusions that urban stormwater represents both the greatest source of these pollutants as well as the greatest opportunity to achieve needed load reductions.

The analysis suggests that while broader application of conventional pollutinat controls will be beneficial, more innovative and advanced controls are required in order to meet the Clarity Challenge. Examples of such controls include, but are not limited to, alternatives to roadway abrasives applications, advanced roadway sweeping practices using the latest technology and equipment, and conveying stormwater to local or regional facilities featuring enhanced treatment through biological or chemical processes.

The cost of strategy implementation is estimated at $1.5 billion. While this cost is indeed large, it is consistent with past expenditures for water quality improvement projects implemented through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency's Environmental Improvement Program.

More information is available in the Integrated Water Quality Management Strategy (IWQMS) Project Report [395 Pages -9.7MB] or view this slide presentation for an overview of the results and outcomes of the PRO and IWQMS projects [26 slides 1.8MB ].

Phase 3 of the TMDL addresses the following questions:

  • How will the strategy be implemented?
  • How will progress be assessed?

Phase 3, the current phase, represents the transition from the science-based policy formation phases to the implementation and performance evaluation phase. In this phase the recommended strategy will be implemented by local government agencies, as well as state, regional and federal regulatory and land management agencies through their respective programs. Load reduction requirements will be established based on allocations contained in the TMDL document.

It is expected that future stormwater discharge permits, Memoranda of Agreement MOA and codes will include pollutant load reduction requirements. However, it should be noted that our agencies are committed to cooperating with their respective constituencies in an attempt to ensure that milestones schedules are considered workable.

Progress toward meeting the Clarity Challenge will be assessed through the TMDL Management System, a program intended to define the process and protocols by which consistent methods and tools are used to quantitatively estimate and track the amount of load reductions achieved through specific actions on the ground. In addition, monitoring programs are a key part of evaluating progress. A Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program (RSWMP) is currently being developed for the purpose of verifying the effectiveness of load reduction actions. Lake clarity status and trend monitoring will continue in order to assess the Lake's response to these actions.

What's New:
   Lake Clarity Crediting Program

Because urban stormwater is the main source and represents the greatest opportunity to resolve the Lake clarity problem, NDEP and the Lahontan Water Board sought to develop a program that would drive accountability and motivate effective action to improve Lake Tahoe clarity. An Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Targeted Watershed Initiative Grant was used to create the Lake Clarity Crediting Program (Crediting Program).

The Crediting Program is the framework that connects on-the-ground actions taken by local governments and state transportation agencies to the goal of restoring Lake Tahoe clarity. It defines a comprehensive and consistent system to quantify, track and report load reduction actions. In order to maximize review efficiency and consistency and comparability of results Crediting Program specifies the use of standardized protocols for this purpose. Although the Handbook lays out the requirements necessary to consider the utilization of other methods and tools, the Crediting Program encourages the use of the following approved tools:

  • The Pollutant Load Reduction Model is the standard load reduction estimation tool, which integrates load reductions achieved through combinations of source control practices and treatment BMPs in a catchment. The beta-version of the PLRM is due to be released around mid- October. A public meeting has tentatively been scheduled for October 21 to release the model.
  • The Best Management Practice Maintenance Rapid Assessment Methodology (BMP RAM) and Road RAM are the standard condition assessment methods used to inspect and report actual conditions in comparison to the expected conditions used in load reduction estimations. THE BMP RAM is now available for download! The Road RAM is scheduled to be completed by end of March 2010.
  • The TMDL Accounting and Tracking Tool (A&T Tool) is the central credit accounting system. It stores information related to catchment schedules and inspection results and generates reports showing the credits awarded each year for specific catchments and urban jurisdictions. The A&T Tool also tracks and reports load reductions at all scales from specific catchments to the overall basin. The A&T Tool is scheduled to become available in the near future.

Through the fall of 2010, NDEP and the Lahontan Water Board will work with local governments and transportation agencies on a non-regulatory basis to test and implement the protocols, tools and methods described in the Handbook. Through the beta-testing we expect to improve the Crediting Program and Handbook to make them more efficient, functional and better able to support targeted efforts to reduce pollutant loading. Funding is being sought to support testing and training for jurisdictions to implement the Handbook. The Handbook will be updated in the Fall of 2010 based on lessons learned and comments received during the beta-test period. At that time, we expect to incorporate the Crediting Program into policies, permits, MOA and codes. Comments or questions on the Crediting Program and Handbook during the beta-test period may be submitted to .

Best Management Practice Maintenance
Rapid Assessment Methodology (BMP RAM)


The BMP RAM is a simple, repeatable field observation and data management tool that can assist Lake Tahoe natural resource managers in determining the relative condition of urban stormwater treatment BMPs. The primary purpose of the BMP RAM is to inform the user of the relative urgency of water quality maintenance for Treatment BMPs. The BMP RAM evaluations, therefore, do not specifically address or consider the quality of the design of a particular Treatment BMP relative to others. Rather, the BMP RAM provides a practical, consistent and reliable tool to track the condition of a particular Treatment BMP relative to its observed condition at the time of installation or immediately following complete maintenance.

Three items are available for download [see box at right]. The Technical Document contains background information describing how the tool works and the rationale for tool development choices. The User Manual describes the specific protocols to create a Treatment BMP Inventory, conduct field observations, and interact with the database. The Database is the tool used to house and manage data and calculate RAM scores. Microsoft Access 2007 and familiarity with the Technical Document and User Manual are required to operate the database.

What's Next:    Draft Lake Tahoe TMDL Peer Review and Final Draft Document Production

In the summer of 2009, a Draft Lake Tahoe TMDL document was sent out to nationally recognized experts in a variety of disciplines for peer review. Please see the Lahontan Water Board's website, where the review request and reviewer comments are posted. Also posted are the documents provided to the peer reviewers, including the Draft Lake Tahoe TMDL document. Please do not submit comments on the document at this time. Lahontan Water Board and NDEP staffs are working with the Lake Tahoe TMDL Scientific Advisor to address the peer review comments; a revised draft is expected to be available for public review and comment in late 2009.

Please stay tuned to this webpage for periodic updates. If you would like additional information or to be added to the stakeholder distribution list, please contact .

Information Clearinghouse

Meetings Presentations and Materials

Newsletters 02/06 — Lake Tahoe Nutrient & Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load


Standards
Monitoring
NonPoint Source Pollution
Laboratory Certification
401 Water Quality Certification
Lake Tahoe Watershed Activities
Staff Contacts


 NRS 445A.010 through 445A.730


901 South Stewert Street, Suite 4001
Carson City, NV 89701-5249

Phone: (775) 687-9444 — Fax: (775) 687-5856

Home
Bureau of Water Quality Planning


NDEP Site Map  —  Topic Index
NDEP Home Page